Category Archives for Articles
The 2 Ugliest Charts in the World
What a week! Alphabet (GOOGL) failed on earnings and there’s no peace in the Middle East. So let’s go over: The 2 ugliest charts in the world Why it’s hard to be an AI hyperscaler right now Why Nvidia may be a value trap Where sentiment sits Let’s go. Ugliest Chart in the World #1 SpaceX (SPCX) was hot for 4 days. Now it’s been cut in half. We identified $150 as an obvious line in the sand. And SpaceX just cut through it like a knife through butter: And let’s give credit to Sami Abusaad! He got short at $154.89 and has been riding it down the whole way. So why is this stock getting dumped? Because the more the stock drops, the more attention is paid to the danger on the horizon (insider lockup expirations). That’s created a race to the exits. Meanwhile, Wall Street banks (many of whom earned paid big fat IPO underwriting fees from SpaceX) love the stock. According to Koyfin, the average analyst target price is $236.71: So they think SpaceX will double. Do you? Now let’s talk about its twin… Ugliest Chart in the World #2 This is Oracle (ORCL) over the past year. Oracle has a major problem. It’s a hyperscaler with potential credit problems. While a company like Microsoft has heaps of recurring revenue and free cash flow to reinvest in capital expenditures, Oracle does not. Just so you understand the difference in scale here, Microsoft generated almost $73 billion in free cash flow over the past 12 months. Oracle (ORCL) had NEGATIVE free cash flow of almost $24 billion. So it has to borrow tons of debt to power its AI dreams. Maybe too much. It’s Hard Out Here for a Hyperscaler The AI market remains split between “haves” and “have nots.” The AI hyperscalers are most certainly have-nots in 2026, given these performance numbers: Alphabet (GOOGL): +2.8% Amazon (AMZN): +2.3% Meta (META): -7.9% Microsoft (MSFT): -19% Oracle (ORCL): -36% Meanwhile, the VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is up a whopping 61%. This makes sense because the hyperscaler buildout is a wholesale transfer of cash flow to the likes of Nvidia (NVDA), AMD (AMD), ASML (ASML), Micron (MU), SanDisk (SNDK), etc. Think of it this way. Google sucks up money selling ads. Then that money goes straight to hardware and chips from the likes of Nvidia, AMD, Micron, Dell, etc. Which flows down to networking gear, semiconductor equipment, etc. At some point the trend reverses, but for now – hardware looks like easy money. Especially when we have Alphabet raising its capex forecast. And Meta, Microsoft, and Amazon might do the same when they report earnings this week. Is Nvidia a Value Trap? Many traders and investors are zeroing in on Nvidia’s (NVDA) valuation. The stock is now trading at 21x forward earnings, which looks cheap for the flagship AI chip name: But I wonder if Nvidia is a value trap. As in, it looks cheap but goes nowhere. I see Nvidia’s biggest challenge as a lack of sex appeal relative to other places within the AI landscape. Right now, the market is excited about the memory and storage names, because that’s where the biggest supply-demand imbalance is. On Thursday’s earnings call, Intel (INTC) CEO Lip-Bu Tan said “…memory has become the big supply constraint challenge.” Yes, Nvidia is most likely still supply-constrained. Just not at the level of a Micron (MU) or SanDisk (SNDK). But we’ll know for sure this coming week. If we see Meta, Microsoft, and Amazon signal higher capex spending and Nvidia does nothing, then maybe the thrill really is gone. We’ll see. In the meantime, I recommend watching this interview with Cerebras (CBRS) CEO Andrew Feldman, who shares some interesting points about the AI chip universe. He discusses why Nvidia’s CUDA platform may be losing its competitive moat, though you should obviously take that with a massive grain of salt: Investors Are Bearish… for Now The AAII Sentiment Survey shows that just 29.6% of investors are bullish. This is well below the 37.5% long-term average. And it’s a massive decline from last week’s 44.9% reading (above average bullishness). So are investors bearish? Kind of. These sentiment surveys have been topsy-turvy all year, so we never get any sustained bullishness or bearishness. That reduces the predictive power of these numbers, which wasn’t all that great to begin with (outside of real extremes). Meanwhile, the CNN Fear & Greed Index is at 41, which is slightly fearful. Add it up and it looks like investors are far from euphoric. But they’re not down in the dumps either.
Continue Reading -->The First Step to a Crash
I’m naturally inclined to be bearish. I have been since my formative years in the market during the 2008 GFC. There are only two, maybe three times in a career where it pays to be bearish. This may be one of them. Last week I detailed the steps to a possible stock market crash this October. We just got the first step in that sequence: an initial break in the Dow Jones Industrial Average from the summer rally trend. The reason for this break is that something appears to be going wrong in the Iran situation. The US 10y yield is approaching 20 year highs, crude oil is abundant yet going higher in price, and gold, the best barometer for global base money, is sinking. As more global money gets burned up securing crude oil, there is less available to roll over the massive amount of debt that’s been built up since 2020. If central banks don’t start printing, base money doesn’t grow, and asset prices fall as there is no money to bid higher for financial assets. An exchange with Senator Kennedy and Secretary Hegseth this week should give the market a reason to sell more as it prices in a deteriorating situation in Iran. Senator Kennedy, usually with an unperturbed and jovial demeanor, seems flustered to a degree I’ve never seen him before. He thinks the situation is getting serious, and that “we are down to it”. I’ll bet he just received a briefing telling him the supply chain breakdown we’ve been hearing about since March is coming soon unless we commit ground troops to go into Pickaxe Mountain, destroy centrifuges, and end the conflict. With the House passing a resolution to limit Trump’s ability to escalate further, I think the market has more downside in the near future to price in a possible worst case scenario of a supply chain breakdown if the US doesn’t send in ground troops. This is a situation with no good outcome, and it’s starting to resemble Britain’s Suez crisis. I’ve been in about 70% cash since March, and now I wish my cash position was even bigger. I’ve got about 15% in gold miners and 7.5% in energy, shipping, and fertilizer stocks. Right now, I wish I’d bought more of the “conflict” stocks such as $XOM, $NTR, and $DAC earlier this year, and I wish I’d sold more of the gold miners in March. My portfolio seems to be in the same situation as the US in Iran: no good outcome in sight. I’m too long and too short at the same time. I can’t sell what I’ve got that is going down, and I can’t buy more of what I’ve got that is going up. The only way out of this situation for me is to either get shorter or get longer. There’s no way I’m getting longer with a market setup this bad fundamentally, so I’m sticking to my plan I detailed last week of waiting for a confirmation of a bear market with a failure of the $DJIA to get back above this initial break level of $51,850 if bulls attempt a rally back in the next couple weeks, then, and only then, shorting the $SPY and/ or $QQQ. It’s not just the US in Iran that is worrying the market. The Yen keeps getting weaker with a clean break above $160. The Bank of Japan won’t tolerate too weak of a Yen for much longer. An emergency rate hike by the BOJ would weaken the dollar, and that would slow the capital inflows into the USA that have been flowing into financial markets. The stock market needs foreign capital inflows to sustain these lofty valuations. Stock valuations are too high to find any meaningful support from value investors, and passive investors won’t help the situation if concern about lower prices causes them to stop retirement inflows. There are dozens of reasons to be bearish, but the market simply has not cared about any of them as long as excess liquidity was finding it’s way into stocks. The SpaceX IPO was very large and took up a lot of balance sheet capacity (i.e. liquidity) that is now needed to support stock prices. It’s been my view that the professionals on Wall Street had the resolve to forge together a market for two more big IPOs: Anthropic and OpenAI, and that would signal an intermediate top in the market. Scrapping those IPO’s would be an even more bearish indicator that the pros on the Street don’t want to even try because they see a bear market ahead. Bear markets are extremely difficult to navigate because they require you to constantly think negatively, to think about what can go wrong. This goes against our human nature to always improve, to think about what can go right. I’m far more introverted than the average trader (an extreme INTP on Jung’s psychological type, and a Type Five on the enneagram), and as a result, I’ve spent more time analyzing my own mental activity than the average trader. I’ve come to understand how being so bearish since the QE era began in 2012 cost me so much. It was really just a pessimistic world view that made me see only the reasons the markets should go down. Around March of 2020, I began to understand the benefits of shifting my mindset to a more productive, positive, and optimistic one. I began to see clearly that it wasn’t pessimists that got rich trading in the markets. The bearish arguments seemed so smart, so correct, but they just didn’t matter. Other guys were getting rich by being bullish, and I was stuck in a negative mental state with more desire for wealth than talent in attaining it. For me, finding success in the markets was a choice. It was a choice to do the work to be bullish on something. That happened to be gold, and that choice changed my trajectory in a big
Continue Reading -->How This Stock Market Will Top
“There is nothing new in Wall Street. There can’t be because speculation is as old as the hills. Whatever happens in the stock market to-day has happened before and will happen again.” -Edwin Lefèvre, Reminiscences of a Stock Operator. The term “speculator” has been used derogatorily ever since the 1929 stock market crash. Ben Graham spent an entire chapter in Security Analysis attempting to delineate the differences between investing and speculating. I’ve read that chapter dozens of times over the years in hopes that repetition will bring clarity as to what exactly is the distinction between the two. All these years later I still can’t believe in a real distinction between speculation and investing, and I don’t think he believed it himself. From what I understand, Ben Graham ran a proto-hedge fund, lost all his investors’ money “investing” according to his method, got a job as a professor teaching others how to do what he couldn’t do for himself, and then spent decades winning back his investors’ lost money. That’s a lot of effort and a lot of years for a scratch trade. If that’s what happened to the genitor of common stock “investing” as we know it today, then for my money, speculation seems like a better approach… Nowadays it’s almost verboten to refer to your market participation as “speculation.” This wasn’t always the case. It certainly wasn’t the case in the late 1920’s. I like to surf old New York Times archives from the financial section to get a feel for the zeitgeist from earlier periods in the market. What’s most stunning to a contemporary reader is the brutal honesty with which reporters delivered the financial news. Everyone back then accepted that stock markets were for speculation. There was no need to explain price movement with a fundamental narrative. It was all insiders creating pools and bidding up stocks, or hammering them down. Today we would call that “insider trading.” While it’s tempting to think so much has changed in the stock market between then and now, I don’t think our markets are very different from markets in the late 1920’s. That’s because human nature never changes. The quote from Lefèvre stands true: whatever happens in the stock market today has happened before and will happen again. Deep in the annals of stock market history lie the clues to discern what we are going through in the present. Market quotations, in their essence, are the manifestation of thoughts in the minds of men. To study their recorded thoughts from the past is the closest we can come to gaining their experience, and experience is the most powerful tool we have in attempting to win in the markets. We can stamp either label we’d like on the activity, whether it’s investing or speculation, but the approach is the same: figure out what has worked in the past, and apply it to the present. This is the way we win in the markets. As for me, I think it’s all speculation, so we better aim to do it well. Proper investing is merely one element of speculation. You’ve got to have some understanding of basic fundamental conditions to speculate well. It’s my view that we are in the contraction phase of the business cycle, and that this autumn we will see a window of opportunity for the market to sell. All the conditions are in place: a stock market that requires a lot to go right to justify a 20 PE, a new technology that created a mania and parabolic charts like memory chip stocks, an opaque securitization scheme with leverage in private credit, the largest stocks shifting their capitalization tables from buybacks to debt issuance for AI capex, and now the biggest IPOs in history adding tons of shares on the market. If you were looking for a recipe to make a top in the stock market, you couldn’t ask for better ingredients. To understand how to speculate in this market properly, I study the past. The charts of previous market tops show us the subtle clues that revealed the shifting probabilities favoring price declines rather than further increases after a long bull run. Below are two famous crashes we can scour for portents that inside the minds of men, fear was beginning to replace greed, stocks were being distributed from strong hands to weak hands, and the natural proclivity for stock prices was to retreat. The 1929 and 1987 tops display a certain uniformity in price structure that we can capture and build into a “top template” for memorization and pattern recognition as we move into the window for a crash this autumn of 2026. While all tops have their own unique characteristics, there are two broad categories of tops I’ve identified from historical studies: autumn tops and spring tops. 1929 and 1987 are autumn tops, and 2000 and 2008 are spring tops. Since we are past the spring window, and the 2026 market most resembles the autumn tops, I’m focusing on those. The autumn tops both share these basic elements in common: a summer time rally, an extension of price far above the 200 day moving average, an initial break, a failure to surpass the initial break price level, and an autumn crash. Here are annotations of the basic elements on the historical charts of the Dow Jones Industrial Average:. 1929: 1987: Now here’s an annotation on the current 2026 $DJIA and what I’d expect to happen if this market follows the autumn top template. 2026: After this summer rally, I’m looking for an initial break sometime in late August or early September, coinciding with back-to-school time when no one besides professional traders will be paying attention to the markets. Everyone will be busy getting back to work and CFO’s will be creating budgets for the next year. This is the earliest an initial break would occur. The initial break, if it comes, would be our first warning that the market is at risk of following
Continue Reading -->The 5 Horsemen of the AI-pocalypse
What a week! We may have peace in the Middle East, SapceX is fighting for its life, and we have a new AI powerhouse trading in the US: Meet the 5th Horseman, SK Hynix I called these stocks the 4 Horsemen of the AI-pocalypse: SanDisk (SNDK) Micron (MU) Western Digital (WDC) Seagate (STX) AI has created unprecedented demand for storage and memory to the point that they comprise 4 of the 5 best S&P 500 stocks this year: And now we may have a new horseman in the form of South Korean memory giant SK Hynix (SKHY), which had a blockbuster US market debut Friday. The $26.5 billion deal priced at $149 per share, and the stock was trading around $169 as of 2:33 pm ET. Pretty solid first day. And CEO Kwak Noh-jung is telling the right story. He told Reuters “We forecast that next year will be the worst year in the industry’s history from the supply perspective.” And he added that demand will exceed supply beyond 2030. Nothing drives momentum like a massive supply-demand imbalance. So I’m making SK Hynix a probationary “5th Horseman of the AI-pocalypse.” Get David Prince’s take on SK Hynix here: Meanwhile, another high-profile IPO is fighting its own battle: SpaceX Fights for $150 We all know the bear case for SpaceX (SPCX). IPO lockup expirations will flood the market with shares. The valuation is outrageous. The Nasdaq 100 addition didn’t help the stock. At the same time, it is stubbornly holding the $150 area: That looks like a major psychological line in the sand. And maybe this situation is as simple as a hard break above or below this level will dictate the next big move. For more on SpaceX, check out this video: And since we’re on the topic of IPOs and AI… Bank Earnings Should Be HUGE This Year This coming week, we get earnings from the big banks like JP Morgan (JPM), Goldman Sachs (GS), Bank of America (BAC), and Morgan Stanley (MS). And now that I think about it, maybe the banks are a stealth AI play. Especially the capital markets focused names like Goldman and Morgan Stanley, which are up nicely in 2026: Aside from the massive SpaceX IPO and the prospective OpenAI and Anthropic deals, there’s been a ton of capital markets activity related to AI, like: Alphabet (GOOGL) raising $85 billion in equity Oracle (ORCL) raising $40 billion to help fund its AI buildout Super Micro (SMCI) raising $7 billion to buy components to fill new $39 billion in AI server orders According to Crunchbase, global venture funding hit $510 billion in the first half of 2026. That compares to $440 billion for all of last year. Crunchbase also said that this is the strongest exit market since 2021. All this capital markets activity should mean fat fees for Wall Street banks. Earnings Season Is About to Go BOOM Q1 earnings season was huge, thanks to massive beats in tech, particularly in the semiconductor industry. As noted above, this coming week, Q2 results kick off with the likes of JP Morgan (JPM), Netflix (NFLX), and ASML (ASML). I’d argue ASML is the biggest report of the week since it sells into the AI/Semi giants like Samsung, AMD (AMD), SK Hynix (SKHY), Micron (MU), Intel (INTC), and Taiwan Semi (TSM). Note: Taiwan Semi also reports next week. There’s a whole lotta optimism out there. FactSet data shows that 111 S&P 500 companies issued guidance. 57% issued positive guidance, well above the long-term average of 41%. This is the highest percentage of companies issuing positive guidance since Q3 2021. And tech guidance is at a record high. Analysts are also pumped. They are now estimating 23.3% growth, up from 18.8% on March 31. And looking forward, Q3 growth is forecast at 26.8%, and Q4 is 24.1%. This is bad. Because the bar is very high. Plus, if results come in as expected or better, we are going to be facing some tough year-over-year comparisons next year. But even as companies and analysts are positive, investors and traders show no signs of joy: Sentiment Remains Neutral The AAII Sentiment Survey shows that 36.3% of investors are bullish. This keeps sentiment in neutral territory. And while we’ve had a few positive or negative readings here and there, there hasn’t been a true extreme reading (in either direction) since early 2025. Meanwhile, the CNN Fear & Greed Index is at 47, smack in the middle at neutral. On balance, this is all bullish because it shows little euphoria on the part of market participants.
Continue Reading -->Big IPOs Are Big Business on Wall Street
I’ll never forget the lessons I learned about Wall Street during the Facebook IPO in May of 2012. I was the newest guy on the desk at a prop trading firm, and it was the summer of the PIIGS Euro debacle and Draghi’s “Whatever it takes” speech. It was a chaotic backdrop for the most anticipated IPO in decades. The FB offering was huge in terms of shares, and one trader on the desk had an allotment of shares in his personal account. The offering price was $38, and in the premarket, it couldn’t hold above $43. The guy with FB shares was an amazing trader with superb instincts. He sold his shares at the open because he didn’t like the way the stock was acting. The stock had a brief spurt higher, then sank the rest of the morning. By mid afternoon, it was approaching the IPO price. We all saw how weak it was. We watched in amazement that there wasn’t any demand to keep the price above the initial offer figure of $38. As the price slowly approached the offering price, more and more volume came on the offer. Massive quantities of shares were being dumped in the most overhyped IPO since the .com era. It seemed to take forever for the price to get down to $38. Penny by penny it sank listlessly. We all knew it was going to break below the figure, and then, out of seemingly nowhere, infinite sized bidding came in at $38. Every single share that was offered was met with an inert floor of demand at $38. Price never went one penny below the initial offer that first day of trading. That was the underwriting syndicate bidding in infinite size for the stock. This is the lesson I learned that day: Wall Street will not allow itself to look bad to the public. By sheer force of will, the money will be found to support shares that need to be supported to keep a proper image in the investing public’s eyes. This is the way in which Wall Street professionals operate. A retail trader like myself can only watch in admiration at the way they handle their business. I’ve never forgotten that day, and I’m reminded of it now as we move beyond the SpaceX IPO and into the IPOs of OpenAI and Anthropic. I still hold the view that we are in the contraction phase of the economic cycle, but I don’t think the market has a window to move down significantly until after August, and likely not until after the November midterms. Those dates are far into the future, and not our concern for the present. For the moment, Wall Street has at least two more big IPOs to work through, and I am supremely confident that the professionals on the street will make the IPOs a success no matter what. So while I am growing increasingly bearish as we move into the second half of the year, I am still aware of the realities of the business of markets, and it’s bad for business when stock prices go down. I’m still in mostly cash, but you can’t make money if you don’t have a position so I’m looking for some positions that I can work into. I’ve analyzed all my trades for the 1st half of the year, and it’s amazing that March was my only down month considering how disappointing some of my entries and exits have been so far this year. The only reason I’m still in good shape this year is because I stick to a discipline. I intend to keep sticking to what has worked for me so far. My discipline is to only buy two types of setups: technical breakouts in good price structures when the $SPY is above its 8 and 21 day moving averages, and large positions in stocks that I like fundamentally. The breakout trades are tactical, and as such, I keep a constant risk size in those, without letting any position get bigger than about 7.5% of the total account. These trades produce positive cash flow on average and keep me involved in the game to feel how things are developing. These are generally less than a 3 month average holding period. My position trades are different. Those are where the vast majority of my gains come from, can make up 90% of my account, and are generally a 9-18 month average holding period. Since we are not yet in a period where the $SPY is trending nicely above a rising 8 and 21 day moving average, I’m focusing less on breakout trades and more on working slowly into some stocks I think could weather the coming storm later this year. I only feel comfortable holding large positions in stocks that I can analyze as having some compelling value. There’s several stocks I like in this regard. I’ve already shared the pipeline companies I like because their asset base is irreplaceable and should hold value through a downturn, then soar if and when the Fed is forced into yield curve control and inflation breaks out in the years ahead. In keeping with the hard asset theme like pipelines, I’m also looking for companies that own assets and trade around book value. If the assets on their books are priced properly, they should have limited downside in the deflationary event that is my current base case. Here are some stocks I’m stalking to find a small, low risk entry now with a plan to build a much larger position over time if these initial buys don’t get stopped out: $RYN trades at 1.2x book value, and it yields about 5%. But it is tied to housing which I’m not bullish on until rates come down so I’m in no rush to take offers on this one. I’ll place small bids below the market once rates on the 10 year treasury find a good top. $NTR trades at 1.4x
Continue Reading -->How Meta Can Hit $1,000
We’re cruising into the July 4 holiday so let’s take a look at the 5 things you need to know right now. How Meta Can Hit $1,000+ On Thursday, Bloomberg reported that Meta (META) is planning a cloud infrastructure business called “Meta Compute” to sell excess compute capacity for AI and other applications. If this is real, it would put Meta in competition with the likes of Amazon (AMZN), Microsoft (MSFT), and Alphabet (GOOGL). You could argue this a million different ways. The bears will say Meta should not have excess compute capacity, and it’s entering battle with aggressive competitors. Or maybe this gives Meta the potential for a higher valuation because it’s hitching a more direct ride to the growth of AI. But I ask myself, couldn’t Meta make way more money by just selling ads to AI companies? This seems like the easy money instead of rolling the dice with hundreds of billions in AI infrastructure investments. Yes, Meta should use AI for things like improving ad targeting and speeding up code development. Everybody knows that. But it seems far smarter to be the cash register counting up all the ad dollars from OpenAI, Anthropic, etc. Call me crazy. But if Meta backs off from its wildly aggressive AI spending plans, I think it’s going straight to $1,000. Because earnings estimates will go through the roof. The problem is that this could take years. I mean, how long did it take before they realized the Metaverse sucked? Techflation Is Here In 1965, Intel (INTC) co-founder Gordon Moore observed that the number of transistors in a chip would double about every two years, with the price dropping by half. That was declared “Moore’s Law.” It’s something of an outdated concept for technical reasons. For example, transistors can only get so small. But what if AI, to some degree, has given us Moore’s Law, only upside down? Prices for SSDs, DRAM, CPUs, and even old-school spinning hard drives are going up. This SanDisk (SNDK) SSD drive cost T3 Live $150 in January 2023: Today, it’s going for $280+ on Amazon: News reports indicate that Intel is raising prices for desktop CPUs. These are not super-powered AI chips. But it looks like we have an upward pull on everything related to computers, smartphones, and tablets. If people are paying higher prices for SSD drives, why not everything else too? Recently, Microsoft (MSFT) announced higher prices for its Xbox video-game consoles. It expects storage and memory prices to double by the fall of 2027. And Apple (AAPL) jacked up prices on Macbooks and iPads. Welcome to techflation. Did Warsh and the Jobs Report Shift FOMC Expectations? The Nonfarm Payrolls report was slightly light today. And yesterday Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh said inflaation risk are declining. So have FOMC rate hike expectations shifted lower? Nope. The CME’s FedWatch tool shows that markets are pricing in a 79% chance of higher rates by year-end. This compares to 83.1% yesterday and 80.8% a week ago. So nothing’s changed on that front. And the expectation of higher rates is boosting this name: Robinhood Rockets! Sami Abusaad has been super bullish on Robinhood (HOOD). And it’s been on a tear: One reason is the expectation of higher interest rates. Higher rates means bigger profits on margin loans. And margin loans have been at record levels. Plus, based on Interactive Brokers’ (IBKR) June 2026 numbers, we can assume Robinhood is seeing heavy trading volumes. And if the crypto market can turn the corner, that would give Robinhood even more rocket fuel. Crypto revenue has been a sore spot for Robinhood, so if that reverses, it could be off to the races at an even faster pace. FYI: IBKR is one of my biggest positions. Wait. Are Investors and Traders Bearish? The AAII Sentiment Survey shows that investors flipped back to bearish this week. Just 31.4% of investors are bullish on stocks for the next 6 months, a substantial drop from last week’s 44.9%. This is the sixth bearish reading in the last seven weeks. It seems like folks are still worried about the economy, the direction of the FOMC, and the sustainability of the AI/semi boom. Meanwhile, CNN’s Fear & Greed Index is at just 31, indicating moderate fear. Plus, the CBOE’s equity put-call ratio is at 0.69, which is in the neighborhood of neutral. No sentiment indicator can help you nail the market every time. But rampant euphoria often coincides with market tops. And we are nowhere near that.
Continue Reading -->Micron Put Apple to the Test
What a week! Micron (MU) dropped a blockbuster earnings, report, Apple (AAPL) raised prices, and oil came crashing down. Let’s talk about what’s going on in this fun-filled market: This Really Is the 90’s Era All Over Again It’s been hard out there for the AI hyperscalers like Meta (META), Alphabet (GOOGL), and Microsoft (MSFT), who are spending ungodly amounts of cash on hardware like memory, storage, and networking equipment. That means they are transferring their cash flow to companies like SanDisk (SNDK), Intel (INTC), Western Digital (WDC), and this week’s earnings superstar Micron (MU). So it’s no shocker that the 2026 S&P 500 leaderboard looks like this: Virtually all of these companies cashed in by selling picks and shovels in the 1990’s Internet boom. Now it’s rinse and repeat with AI. Instead of Pets.com and Ask Jeeves and American Online, the end application is Claude or ChatGPT! Just look at Micron’s monster earnings report on Wednesday. They beat revenue expectations by 16%. SanDisk beat by 26% in its last quarter. These picks and shovels (DRAM, flash memory, and even freaking old-school hard drives) are getting so expensive that Apple (AAPL) just raised prices on MacBooks and iPads. And that means… Apple Is Being Put to the Test Apple has an affluent user base that is willing to pay premium prices for a superior user experience. And this MacBook/iPad price hike feels like a test for something even bigger: iPhone price increases. Last quarter, Mac and iPad sales accounted for just 14% of total sales. So when Apple drops its next earnings report (about one month from now), we’ll see how much customers are willing to pay up for the brand. I suspect Apple will do fine because its devices are more or less consumer staples. Some people will choose cheaper models. But who’s going to give up their screens in 2026? Or even worse – switch to Windows/Android? I’m in the market for a new phone myself, and I’d rather pay an extra $100 to $300 to Apple than deal with an inferior user experience. I’m an Apple shareholder, so I won’t pretend I’m unbiased. SpaceX Plays Great Defense I sold my SpaceX (SPCX). And I might have screwed up. Because this stock has been doing a great job of holding that $150 area: We all know the issues with this company. It’s overvalued. A ton of shares will hit the market when lockups expire. We might not see a data center in space for many years. But the buyers keep stepping up This could be a situation where the bear case is way too obvious to be right. At least for now. Because those lockup expirations will pack a big punch. Are We Getting the Fed Wrong? The market continues to brace for higher rates. The CME’s FedWatch Tool shows that the market is pricing in a 77% chance of higher rates by year-end. This hasn’t changed much over the past month. But it is a pretty big sea change from earlier in the year, when we were debating how many cuts we’d see. Though interestingly, this chart from Apollo has been making the rounds: The market is almost always wrong about what the Fed will do, per Apollo: pic.twitter.com/yluOOKYynD — unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) June 26, 2026 Apollo argues the market is usually wrong in sniffing out Fed policy. Which makes sense because the Fed itself isn’t very good at predicting anything. Remember when inflation was “transitory” for about 98 straight years? So maybe, just maybe the smart move is to bet on lower rates? Sentiment Suddenly Flips Bullish. Sort Of. The AAII Sentiment Survey shows that 44.9% of investors are bullish on stocks. This is a big jump from 36.9% last week. And it’s the first above-average bullish reading since May 13. The market peaked on June 2 at SPX 7620, so it took a few weeks for the mood to catch up. And during that time, the market’s slipped a bit. On balance, it would be better to have less bullish sentiment, because it implies there are still doubters on the sidelines. However, this is still far from euphoric sentiment, which we haven’t had in quite some time. Meanwhile, CNN’s Fear and Greed Index is at just 25, in the extreme fear category. Keep in mind Fear and Greed is calculated by market indicators, while AAII is determined by an actual survey, reflecting people’s actual feelings. Add it up and investors/traders are ‘sorta’ bullish.
Continue Reading -->American Assets Worth Owning
250 years ago, 56 men pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their honor to each other that they would support a common cause. Of all the men that signed the Declaration of Independence, not one of them died with nearly as much wealth as they had when they signed. They pledged their fortunes in support of freedom and meant it. They were all wealthy men when they signed but sold down their vast fortunes to support the war against the greatest military power the world had ever seen, and each of them died poor with their fortunes scattered but their honor intact. From the period in between the Declaration of Independence in 1776 and the ratification of the Constitution in 1787, the citizens of the newly formed country needed convincing to form a government after they had just lost a great deal of blood and treasure to abolish the old one. Alexander Hamilton was instrumental in accomplishing this task when he expressed the rationale for the Constitution, line by line, in the publication of the Federalist Papers. Most of the text of the Federalist Papers is devoted to explaining how a central government would allow for a prosperous nation. Hamilton’s chief rationale was that money needed to be raised to build a navy. It was only a navy that would protect commerce. The States were incredibly productive and produced far more than the citizens of the US could purchase. They needed to sell their goods overseas, and a navy was a necessity to protect the merchant ships from their former colonizers and the largest naval power in the world. From the beginning, this country was formed with the idea that commerce leads to prosperity. Commerce has been and always will be an undertaking uniquely suited to the American experience. A notable change in the direction of that commerce is under way and under the radar. In March, the US Gulf Coast region, PADD 3, exported more petroleum products to the rest of the world than at any point in history. The flow of commerce has been a one way trip for 50 years: our wealth flows out, and Middle East oil flows in. Thanks to the vast energy fortress the USA now possesses, as a result of generational capital contributed by our ancestors over the past 170 years of oil exploration in this country that incrementally built an energy dynamo, the flow of commerce is reversing. The rest of the world’s wealth is coming in, and refined energy products are going out. In addition to possessing 46 billion barrels of proven reserves, the US also possesses the world’s most robust and redundant energy infrastructure: 140 refineries capable of processing any crude grade on earth, millions of miles of pipelines, coastal export terminals, and hundreds of thousands of wildcatters and independent oil producers. In its totality, our energy infrastructure is a national treasure. It is our heritage, and it is an asset bequeathed to us by past generations. The American spirit is one of risk taking. It was the risk taking spirit that built the energy infrastructure we now possess. The spirit of risk is still evident, most readily observable in the investment preferences, between Americans and our European cousins. While other western cultures prefer to place their savings in bonds, Americans have historically chosen a riskier, but ultimately more profitable path. We buy stocks. We always have, and we always will. There’s has been and will be more stock market crashes, but the risk taking spirit will always work its way back to the forefront of the American people’s consciousness. While the energy infrastructure this country possesses is priceless, individual assets have a price and are for sale every day on the American stock exchanges. These are assets that I want to own. Most stocks I want to rent, but not these. One asset I’ve owned for over a decade is $EPD. It’s the Cadillac of MLPs. It briefly went below my cost basis in the 2020 crash, and I only doubled my position. It’s one of my largest regrets that I didn’t 3x or 4x my size for the few days out of 10 years I was red on the position. But I think we’re going to get another chance this year to load up on these energy assets that we can keep forever. That chance is going to come because a wave of deflation is already on us, and I don’t think market participants are positioned for falling commodity prices. Over the course of this summer, as global tensions ease, millions of barrels of oil will find their way back into storage. This is likely the reason the major integrated oil companies have let storage run low: they know how much oil is about to come to market after the Iran conflict winds down. If they had topped up storage in the crisis, all that oil coming to market from behind the Strait of Hormuz would crash the spot price, and that is good for no one in the oil industry. As this oil fills storage, and the oil doomers loose their bull case, I suspect the energy names will get sold by all the traders that bought for the “war premium.” Further exacerbating the energy longs later this year should be reduced demand as the full effects of this credit bubble ending weighs on the economy. It’s still my view that we are in the contraction phase of the business cycle, and that means we will get one chance to buy up the energy infrastructure assets that we can keep as permanent assets in our attempt to exit the working class and become part of the investor class in this country. It’s only this country that affords opportunity to the average guy looking to make a better life for himself and his family. If this stock market offers that opportunity to me this year in an energy sell off, I plan on taking it. I’ve learned
Continue Reading -->For Every Stock There is a Season
In the deep south, we’ve fully entered into summer time. That means we can depend on hot, humid weather until about the middle of October. While I can’t pinpoint the exact date the miserable humidity will subside, I do trust my timing prediction of the approximate change of the season. That’s because the seasons are dependably cyclical. They announce their coming and going with tell tale signs. The patterns of the seasons are comforting in their predictability. I like to frame my thinking in the observation of repeatable patterns as a means to navigating life because a predictable future is easier to plan for than a completely haphazard one. It’s a sometimes serendipitous quirk and a sometimes rueful lament that life doesn’t always conform to my mental models of pattern recognition. Markets are a microcosm of life in this regard. A mental model of how markets should work is an essential, if not always useful, toolkit in the business of speculation. The notion that the buying and selling of different groups of stocks could be timed based on cyclical patterns was compelling to me when I started trying to figure out how the market works over 18 years ago. The pattern I use as a mental model to try and determine what “season” the market is in is this graphic depiction of the business cycle: This graph is more of a guideline rather than an instruction manual. The nature of markets is such that perfect conformity to a standard is not high on a list of observable traits. I’ve noticed over the years, that while perfect conformity to this pattern is not realistic, there are observable cycles that do approximately represent the pattern this cycle predicts. The QE era from 2012 to 2022 was a horrible period for trying to use this graph as a guide. But ever since the first rate hike cycle got under way in April 2022, this graph has proven to be a useful guide to me once again. The biggest trade of my life was gold miners from 2023 to autumn 2025, and while my P&L was compelling me to lock in gains on the way up, this cycle graph is what steeled my resolve that letting go of the stocks that made my gains was the only sensible course of action. T he Fed began easing, and I knew from the last time this cycle worked in 2007 that the metals and mining stocks, including the gold mining stocks, should be sold. That decision to lock in profit was a monumental one for me. Now, once again, I feel comfortable using this cycle graph as a guide to determine how to deploy my capital next. My view is that we are in the contraction phase of the business cycle, and my biggest position is by far cash. Several indicators don’t line up exactly with this cycle graph, so I’m not clinging to my view, in fact, I’ve got one foot out of the door on this view already. I’m already building mental models of what would prove my view to be incorrect (one development that would begin invalidate my view is if crude oil holds this 200 day moving average, and makes a run for the highs later this year). But for the moment, I’m planning on using this cycle graph as a guide for what the buy next. The contraction phase of the business cycle should make earnings less predictable, which should make any reliable growth in earnings worth more to institutional investors whose waves of buying leave footprints on the tape. Traditionally, they should be willing to shift capital into drug and grocery store stocks due to the predictable earnings in a weak economy. The consumer packaged goods stocks are all in horrific downtrends, so I’ll need to see some reversal there before I think about building a big position. I’ve never seen $GIS yield this much (5.5% div yield) or trade this cheap (11 PE), but I’ve never seen it have sustained volume declines either. $GIS reports July 1 so I’ll see what they say about volumes and pricing there. This could be the bottom if they are able to stop the declines and get back to growth, but I have no insight there so I’m just watching for now. The consumer packaged goods space is in too much trouble to confidently take a large position. The drug stocks however, are beginning to show the tell tale signs of a change in season. The $IBB is shaping up nicely. $ABBV jumped the gun and bought $APGE this week. $APGE had a picture perfect set up that let you know institutions were buying up all the supply at lower prices, but the SPX with an 8 day moving average underneath the 21 kept me out of breakout trades. $APGE didn’t even give a proper breakout signal before it got taken off the board, but this serves as validation that drug stocks are in play, underpriced, forming constructive price structures, and in the correct part of the business cycle. $AUPH is another one with a text book price structure setup for a breakout. It already broke out above it’s flat top at $16.50 on a gap up. It’s a low risk buy under $17, but I’ve never had good results chasing. There will always be other opportunities. With the SPX and NDX flopping around their 8 and 21 day moving average stack, I think there’s a possibility patience will be rewarded and offer a brief moment to get in something before a trend move higher starts and doesn’t let you in without chasing. I’m still looking towards the August time frame as a period when the market has to deal with a tapped out consumer, services prices that are just too high, and the ramifications of the private credit and life insurance debacle, so a summer rally into Autumn, then a big market reaction is a scenario I’m planning for. Commodities are
Continue Reading -->SpaceX: The Hard Questions Are Here
Peace is coming (hopefully) to the Middle East, sending oil lower while equities stabilized. But if you expected a sleepy summer, you’re disappointed. Because this market remains action-packed. So let’s talk about what’s happening: SpaceX Comes Down to Earth Last Friday, SpaceX (SPCX) came public in the biggest IPO of all time. And it hit Earth with a bang. The deal priced at $135. The stock opened at $150 on the dot and hit a high of $225.64 on Tuesday, from where it started sliding: Even after this 20% drop, its $2.36 trillion market cap is larger than: Broadcom (AVGO) Tesla (TSLA) Meta (META) Micron (MU) Walmart (WMT) JP Morgan (JPM) Analysts expect SpaceX to grow revenues from $35.9 billion this year to $130.9 billion in 2029. Elon Musk himself said he expects SpaceX to generate about $1 trillion in revenue in 2030. But now the tough questions are coming: Was the entire rally engineered through limiting the supply of stock and giving more retail traders access to the IPO? Can Elon Musk sell SpaceX the way he’s sold Tesla? Even if SpaceX can hit growth targets, is the valuation out of control? Will the stock collapse when insiders get the green light to sell? Will the company have to raise even more capital? There are now reports of a potential $20 billion bond offering on the way. I own a whopping 10 shares of SpaceX myself. And I’m thinking about selling, and buying some out-of-the-money puts. Because if SpaceX crashes, it’s bound to be ugly. JR Romero had some harsh words for SpaceX (the stock, not the company) here, and we went deeper into the potential dangers facing this iconic name: The Epic Semiconductor Run Won’t Stop, and Has Another Catalyst The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) might be incapable of going down. It’s up 83% this year and hit another record high on Friday thanks to big moves in names like Intel (INTC), Taiwan Semi (TSM), and AMD (AMD). And it would be up even more if SanDisk (SNDK) was in the ETF. SanDisk is the #1 stock in the S&P 500 this year with its 819% gain. Plus, there’s another catalyst on the horizon: Micron’s (MU) earnings report on Wednesday after the close. Based on the number of AI-related capital raises we’re seeing from the likes of Alphabet (GOOGL), Nvidia (NVDA), SpaceX, and others, demand for memory remains insatiable. So Micron should extend what’s been a monumental winning streak for semiconductor earnings. Warsh Confirms the Drift Towards Higher Rates New FOMC Chairman Kevin Warsh made a big splash at his debut meeting on Wednesday. Warsh shortened the post-meeting statement, ditched the dot plot, announced five new task forces, and declared war on inflation. Warsh’s hawkish show came as a surprise to many because he was viewed as a loyalist to President Trump, who has been vocal in wanting lower rates. And 9 of 18 Fed officials now expect at least one rate hike this year. The market was already leaning in the direction of higher rates, and the Fed reinforced that. Now markets are pricing in an 85% chance of higher rates by year-end, according to the CME’s FedWatch Tool. So the breakdown of expectations is now as follows: 15% chance of rates staying unchanged 37.6% chance of 25 bps in hikes 33.3% chance of 50 bps in hikes 12.5% chance of 75 bps in hikes 1.7% chance of 100 bps in hikes This isn’t a major change from last week. It was more a reinforcement of what the market is looking for. Still, I’m eager to see if the President starts tangling with the independent-minded Warsh. Stocks Go Up, Traders Go “Meh” The latest AAII Sentiment Survey shows that 36.6% of investors are bullish. This is up from last week. But it’s still the 5th straight week of below-average bullishness. That’s even with equity markets hitting record highs, and a US-Iran deal coming together. Meanwhile, CNN’s Fear & Greed Index is at 37, smack dab in the Fear category. But overall, the numbers are healthy because it shows that not everyone is bought into this rally. The last thing we need is euphoric sentiment, which typically happens around tops.
Continue Reading -->